
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:language>srp</dc:language>
  <dc:description xml:lang="srp">Sažetak: U radu su analizirane debate i polemike koje su početkom šezdesetih godina vođene
u Delu, Našim temama, NIN-u i Vidicima, kako bi se utvrdilo na koje je načine u beogradskoj
i zagrebačkoj kulturnoj sredini, deceniju i po nakon osnivanja nove Jugoslavije,
shvatan pojam socijalističke kulture i valorizovan smisao nacionalnih tradicija. Posebna pažnja
posvećena je problemu kosovskog mita, čiji je izvorni smisao u prošlosti bio često podvrgavan
političkim zloupotrebama, te je u socijalistički ustrojenoj sadašnjici odbacivan kao
ideološki neprihvatljiv sadržaj, ali i pitanju da li je Jugoslaviji, zarad uspostavljanja dubljeg
međunacionalnog jedinstva, neophodan jedan zajednički mit. Istraživanjem je utvrđeno
da su, birajući između ćosićevske dogmatično ustrojene vizije jugoslovenske kulture i mišićevskog
modernog pogleda na nacionalnu tradiciju, mlađi naraštaji pesnika i kritičara bili
mnogo skloniji da se opredele za ideološki podobniju kulturnopolitičku strategiju.
</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">The paper analyses debates and discussions led in the early 1960s in the magazines Delo, Naše teme,
NIN and Vidici, in order to determine the ways in which, a decade and a half since the establishment
of the new Yugoslavia, Belgrade and Zagreb’s respective cultural environment understood
the notion of socialist culture and evaluated the purpose of national traditions. Special attention
was paid to the issue of the Kosovo myth, whose original meaning was often subjected to political
misuse in the past, just as it was rejected in the socialist present as ideologically inacceptable content,
but also to the question of whether, for the purpose of strengthening interethnic cohesion,
Yugoslavia needed a shared myth. The distinctive polemical fervour and occasional verbal intensity
of the participants in the examined debates revealed that public discourse on the Kosovo myth in
the early 1960s – even with all ideological disputes aside, which were more related to the unitary
nature of the previous Yugoslav regime than to the conceptual interpretation of Prince Lazar – was
a sensitive issue. This was because it inevitably, through a volatile chain reaction, triggered a series
of cultural and political problems around which there was no consensus. The subject was clearly
complex and ambiguous, causing a certain intellectual discomfort, stirring spiritual unrest and testing
the firmness of the foundations upon which the contemporary vision of Yugoslav culture was
built. Based on the cultural and political stances expressed, participants in the Vidici discussions
could be divided into those, like Ljubomir Simović or Zoran Petrović, who acknowledged Šegedin’s
arguments in favour of the idea of establishing deeper symbolic unity among the Yugoslav peoples,
but instead of Bogomilism, proposed the Battle of Sutjeska or Zelengora as a central point around
which a common myth could be woven; and those who dismissed the revival of old or the creation
of new mythical traditions as an outdated way of understanding the world and an obsolete form of
political action. The research has shown that younger generations of poets and critics, when faced
with the choice between Ćosić’s dogmatic vision of Yugoslav culture and Mišić’s modern take on
national tradition, were much more inclined to opt for the ideologically more conforming cultural
and political strategy.
</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>3085004 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">U traganju za novim jugoslovenskim mitom (o poimanju kulturnih tradicija u diskusijama vođenim na stranicama Naših tema, NIN-a, Dela i Vidika početkom šezdesetih godina) </dc:title>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">In search of a new Yugoslav myth (on the perception of cultural traditions in discussions led on the pages of Naše teme, Nin, Delo and Vidici in the early 1960s)</dc:title>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="srp">Ključne reči: socijalistička kultura, kulturna politika, nacionalna tradicija, internacionalizam, mit, kosovsko opredeljenje, humanistički aktivizam</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Key words: socialist culture, cultural policy, national tradition, internationalism, myth, Kosovo disposition, humanist activism</dc:subject>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:37960</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.17234/9789533792019.7</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-953-379-184-5</dc:identifier>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-6084">Karović, Nemanja</dc:creator>
  <dc:source>Kulturne orijentacije i političke kulture umjetničke inteligencije u Hrvatskoj i Jugoslaviji od 1952. do 1967. godine </dc:source>
  <dc:source>volume: 24</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 111</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 129</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc>
