
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:publisher>Novi Sad : Faculty of Philosophy</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Problems of Graffitiology as an Interdisciplinary Science (Using the Example of Neo-Nazi Street Art)</dc:title>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3122-4838">Petrović Dakić, Ana</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: neo-Nazism, neo-fascism, graffiti, murals, stickers, interdisciplinarity</dc:subject>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>181717 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:37918</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISBN: 978-86-6065-868-7</dc:identifier>
  <dc:date>2024</dc:date>
  <dc:source>Languages And Social Sciences In Contact: The Challenges Of Interdisciplinarity</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 65</dc:source>
  <dc:source>endpage: 65</dc:source>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">The status of graffitiology, as already established by Mitja Velikonja in his
book Political Graffiti, is unstable. It is located between several different and
quite diverse branches of social sciences and arts. Painters, art historians, po-
litical scientists, communicologists, anthropologists, sociologists, linguists, as
well as researchers from fields that are “in between“ could find themselves in
its waters. But – possibly and perhaps precisely because of the aforementioned
– it remains underrepresented, its subject less studied. It seems as if, on the one
hand, it is a “no man’s land”. On the other hand, researchers who would engage
in the study of graffiti quickly become aware that their expertise in one area, or
perhaps even several of them, is not enough to properly deal with the topic that
interests them, and so they turn to others. Also, the subject of graffitiology itself
– graffiti and street art – is not appreciated. It does not have the social status
that would attract first researchers, and then publishers, and financiers who
would support research or publish it. As a result, the terminological apparatus
is insufficiently developed and established, which is another obstacle for those
interested in this topic. Combined with all of the above, the pressure associated
with the “publish or perish’’ system of scientific evaluation leads to researchers
not even engaging in the study of graffiti, thus creating a vicious circle. Thus, a
part of human expression remains under-researched even though it deserves
researchers’ attention like any other. An additional obstacle can be if the graffiti
in question deal with a sensitive topic, as is the case with neo-Nazi messages, so
we will use their example to illustrate some of the problems that graffitiology
faces.
</dc:description>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/other</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
