
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5344-5770">Petrović, Jelena</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2141-8698">Šuvaković, Uroš</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-4424">Nikolić, Ivko</dc:creator>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; digital literacy; emergency remote teaching; remote teaching sustainability; technical support; university students; zoom fatigue</dc:subject>
  <dc:source>Sustainability</dc:source>
  <dc:source>volume: 17</dc:source>
  <dc:source>number: 6</dc:source>
  <dc:source>startpage: 2769</dc:source>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:36061</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/su17062769</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</dc:identifier>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>4256472 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Abstract: Emergency remote teaching was first introduced in the educational system of
the Republic of Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic, not as a planned change but as an
imposed solution aimed at suppressing this infectious disease. This raises the question of
the sustainability of remote teaching after the pandemic and the effects and experiences with
emergency form of this method of teaching in the form it was used during the pandemic.
Therefore, this paper is aimed at examining whether and in what manner technical factors
such as digital competence, device equipment, Internet connection, and Zoom fatigue could
contribute to students’ attitudes and satisfaction with this form of teaching, as well as how all
these factors might contribute to the perception of satisfaction, efficiency, and sustainability
of RT among the students of the teacher education faculties. The research involved 138
female university students from the faculties of education in Serbia. The results point to
the unpreparedness of the educational system for the quick transition to emergency remote
teaching and to inadequate logistic support for the implementation of this form of learning:
from insufficient computer literacy, problems with the good-quality Internet in the territory of
the whole country, having no adequate devices for following classes (most frequently mobile
phones), students’ dissatisfaction with the effectiveness, to the phenomenon of Zoom fatigue
as a consequence. The main finding is that students perceive remote teaching as a “necessary
evil”, something that should be applied only when it is absolutely impossible to have the
usual form of classes, only in emergency situations. This is also corroborated by the fact that
after the pandemic, the school system returned to classes under traditional conditions. This
leads to a conclusion about the unsustainability of the remote teaching model in Serbia, at least
in the form that was applied, most probably because it was university students’ first and only
experience in relation to it gained with emergency remote teaching, in the conditions of the
COVID-19 crisis with its health, psychosocial, and economic pressures and with emergency
form of this method of teaching.
</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2769</dc:description>
  <dc:title xml:lang="srp">Sustainability of Remote Teaching in Serbia: Post-Pandemic Perspectives from Education Faculty Students</dc:title>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
