
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>365395 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:source>The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 71(4)</dc:source>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:32702</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_23403A</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 0003-2565</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Key words: Merger guidelines, Structuralism, Concentratio, Relevant market, Hypothetical monopolist.</dc:subject>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">US DRAFT MERGER GUIDELINES: MANIFESTO OF IMPROVEMENTS OR STEP BACK?</dc:title>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">This paper critically evaluates the draft version of the US Merger Guidelines
from 2023 (D23), which departs from the consumer welfare standard, sparking
intense debates within the academic, professional, and business communities.
D23, released by the US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission,
introduces a shift toward a more structuralist approach in horizontal merger
assessment. The paper examines the diverse perspectives of D23, with some
perceiving it as a populist move sidelining economic rationale and others
viewing it as an attempt to base decisions on factual grounds and enhance
antitrust activism. The discussion emphasises the importance of precision in
defining relevant markets within D23, a crucial element in merger assessment.
This analysis sheds light on the evolving landscape of merger policy, prompting
critical inquiries into the future trajectory of competition law.</dc:description>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9883-8914">Ristić, Bojan</dc:creator>
</oai_dc:dc>
