
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>845942 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Representing Trauma - Writing the Past Into the Present Through Films</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:30612</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:DOI: 10.25626/0136</dc:identifier>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:publisher>Herder-Institut für historische Ostmitteleuropaforschung – Institut der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft</dc:publisher>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Serbien; Konzentrationslager Jasenovac; Massaker von Srebrenica; Kollektives Gedächtnis; Historischer Film</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-0727 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/1903207">Daković, Nevena</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Cultures of History Forum</dc:source>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Cinematic attempts to tell the story of historical mass violence and trauma in former Yugoslavia are often steeped
in political controversy. The article discusses two recent films – ‘Dara of Jasenovac’ (Serbia, 2020) and ‘Quo vadis,
Aida?’ (Bosnia-Herzegovina, 2020) – and the public reactions to them. While both films share certain features such
as looking at historical horrors and inter-ethnic violence from a female perspective, they differ remarkably in style
as well as in how they were received in Serbia and beyond.</dc:description>
</oai_dc:dc>
