
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:29544</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.1515/jafio-2019-0039</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 1542-0485</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Abstract: Food Quality Schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are
often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social
sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP)
distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP
(competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP
distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and
corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both
dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.
</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Funding source: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation under grant agreement No 678024.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Contributors:
Muller, Paul;
Böhm, Michael;
Csillag, Péter;
Donati, Michele;
Drut, Marion;
Ferrer-Pérez, Hugo;
Gauvrit, Lisa;
Gil, Jose M.;
Hoang, Viet;
Malak-Rawlikowska, Agata;
Mattas, Konstadinos;
Napasintuwong, Orachos;
Nguyen, An;
Papadopoulos, Ioannis;
Ristić, Bojan;
Stojanović, Žaklina;
Török, Áron;
Tsakiridou, Efthimia;
Veneziani, Mario;
Bellassen, Valentin
</dc:description>
  <dc:creator>Muller...[et al.], Paul</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9883-8914 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/8682855">Ristić, Bojan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-9835 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/12848231">Stojanović, Žaklina</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable? A Bargaining Power Analysis</dc:title>
  <dc:source>Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 19(2)</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: Bargaining power, market power, transaction costs, institutions, social sustainability indicator</dc:subject>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>763413 bytes</dc:format>
</oai_dc:dc>
