
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">A note on an alternative Gentzenization of RW◦ +</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>140059 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Keywords: GRW◦+, proofs, cut-elimination</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-5168 https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/17546855">Ilić, Mirjana</dc:creator>
  <dc:source>Mathematical Logic Quarterly 67(2)</dc:source>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:29493</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.1002/malq.202000086</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>ISSN: 0942-5616</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Abstract:
In our paper [3], a sequent system GRW◦+ for the contraction-less positive relevant logic with co-tenability, RW◦
+,
is considered. Its sequent system with the rule of cut, which does not involve the truth constant t, is presented,
and the proof that it admits the elimination of cut is given. However, in the proof of the cut-elimination theorem
some forms of proofs, which may cause difficulties for the cut-elimination argument, are not considered. The
purpose of this paper is to present them and to re-prove that GRW◦+ admits the elimination of cut.</dc:description>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">This work was supported
by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Serbia, grant number ON 174026</dc:description>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
