
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
  <dc:creator id="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1637-515X https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/conor/12946279">Praščević, Aleksandra</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">Abstract: The paper deals with important
issues of socio-economic consequences of
economic and political reforms of post-so-
cialist transition countries in the perspective
of more than three decades of their transfor-
mation with variable success. The success of
reforms can be viewed from this historical
perspective in the context of their econom-
ic growth, but also of their social develop-
ment. It answers the question of whether the
economic transition from socialism (dom-
inantly central-planned) to capitalism was
an economic and social success. This is ob-
served from the aspect of achieved economic
growth, integration into the world economy,
and especially into European integrations
(such as the EU), as well as the growth of liv-
ing standards and overall satisfaction of the
citizens of these countries. The COVID-19
pandemic has exposed many of the otherwise
present questions about the possible failure
of the undertaken reforms. The post-pan-
demic world is facing geopolitical tensions,
the basis of which is still a possible division
into two systems (both economic and politi-
cal), which raises the question of whether the
reforms were really successful. The two sig-
nificant shocks that hit the global economy
in the 21st century had significant negative
economic consequences for post-socialist
economies, as well. First it was the Great Re-
cession (2007-09) and then the COVID-19
pandemic. Post-socialist countries have faced
economic difficulties, but also the political
rise of undemocratic forces. Some of these
difficulties have been solved by promoting
the concept of stabilocracy. Today, when we
are witnessing the war in Ukraine, the ques-
tion is open again whether the neoliberal
project, which was the base of undertaken
reforms, together with promoting concept of
stabilocracy represent a solution or the cause
of further divisions in Europe</dc:description>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceProceedings</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:28363</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:format>374166 bytes</dc:format>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Socio-economic consequences of reforms in post-socialist countries : perspectives from the post-COVID world</dc:title>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:source>3rd International Interdepartmental Conference “Shaping Post-COVID World – Challenges for Economic Theory and Policy” : book of proceedings</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">KEY WORDS: POST-SOCIALIST COUN- TRIES, GEOPOLITICAL TENSIONS, ECO- NOMIC TRANSITION, STABILOCRACY</dc:subject>
</oai_dc:dc>
