
<ns0:uwmetadata xmlns:ns0="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/V1.0" xmlns:ns1="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0" xmlns:ns10="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/provenience/V1.0" xmlns:ns11="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/provenience/V1.0/entity" xmlns:ns12="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/digitalbook/V1.0" xmlns:ns13="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/etheses/V1.0" xmlns:ns2="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/extended/V1.0" xmlns:ns3="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/entity" xmlns:ns4="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/requirement" xmlns:ns5="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/educational" xmlns:ns6="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/annotation" xmlns:ns7="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/classification" xmlns:ns8="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/lom/V1.0/organization" xmlns:ns9="http://phaidra.univie.ac.at/XML/metadata/histkult/V1.0">
  <ns1:general>
    <ns1:identifier>o:1461</ns1:identifier>
    <ns1:title language="ar">Kitābu ẖayālî</ns1:title>
    <ns1:language>ar</ns1:language>
    <ns1:description language="sr">Samo neke utvrđene karakteristike po kojima se srednjovekovna logika na Zapadu razlikuje od kasne antičke mogu se primeniti na logiku koja je otprilike u isto vreme pisana na arapskom jeziku. Metodologija joj je krajnje formalna i metalogička, a centralno mesto zauzima pedagoški pristup. Međutim, nije razvijena doktrina poput premise i po svemu sudeći, manje se bavila protivrečnim zaključcima. Moglo bi se reći da je arapska logika po predmetu proučavanja i metodima u neku ruku bliskija logici kasne antike nego srednjovekovnoj logici pisanoj na latinskom jeziku.

Godina izdavanja:  1727/1728.</ns1:description>
    <ns1:description language="en">Only some of the characteristics found which distinguish medieval Western logic from the logic of late antiquity apply to the logic being written in Arabic at roughly the same time. It is highly formal and metalogical in its treatment, and pedagogically central; but no doctrine like supposition was developed, and there seems to have been far less concern with antinomies. One may say that Arabic logic is somewhat closer to the logic of late antiquity in its concerns and methods than medieval Latin logic.

Year of publishing: 1727/1728. </ns1:description>
    <ns1:keyword language="en">Logic</ns1:keyword>
    <ns1:keyword language="sr">Logika</ns1:keyword>
    <ns2:irdata>no</ns2:irdata>
  </ns1:general>
  <ns1:lifecycle>
    <ns1:upload_date>2012-03-27T10:59:36.933Z</ns1:upload_date>
    <ns1:status>44</ns1:status>
    <ns2:peer_reviewed>no</ns2:peer_reviewed>
    <ns1:contribute seq="0">
      <ns1:role>46</ns1:role>
      <ns1:entity seq="0">
        <ns3:firstname>Hayālî</ns3:firstname>
      </ns1:entity>
    </ns1:contribute>
  </ns1:lifecycle>
  <ns1:technical>
    <ns1:format>application/pdf</ns1:format>
    <ns1:size>5404800</ns1:size>
    <ns1:location>http://phaidrabg.bg.ac.rs/o:1461</ns1:location>
  </ns1:technical>
  <ns1:rights>
    <ns1:cost>no</ns1:cost>
    <ns1:copyright>yes</ns1:copyright>
    <ns1:license>2</ns1:license>
  </ns1:rights>
  <ns1:classification>
    <ns1:purpose>70</ns1:purpose>
  </ns1:classification>
  <ns12:digitalbook>
    <ns12:name_magazine language="ar">Kitābu ẖayālî</ns12:name_magazine>
    <ns12:release_notes language="xx">1727/1728. </ns12:release_notes>
  </ns12:digitalbook>
</ns0:uwmetadata>
